Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Sep 2000 17:28:42 -0400 | From | safemode <> | Subject | Re: Problem with 2.4.0-test9-pre6 seems to be SHM |
| |
Ok, compiling using a cvs of X i got a couple hours ago, I'm just wondering what the average segment number is for SHM on an X session that has been up for a while .... i'll get back with any sort of info on if the SHM problem has been solved with this latest CVS or if it continues to look like a kernel SHM problem. So far though, 2.4.0-test8-vm3 is handling the problem Quite well as opposed to test9, which died in 2 hours upon booting ...and it didn't have the added stress of compiling X.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |