Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:31:34 -0700 (PDT) | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ISAPNP using an invalid IO_APIC IRQ |
| |
On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, M.H.VanLeeuwen wrote: > > Is this patch acceptable?
Please explain.
The test seems to be that "if there are IO_APICs, a PnP irq _has_ to be an IO_APIC irq".
> + if (!IO_APIC_IRQ(irq) && io_apic_irqs) > + return 1;
Which makes no sense to me. Why would a legacy irq not be acceptable? Especially as they seem to be acceptable if there are _no_ IO-APIC irq's.
Linus
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |