lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    So make noise.  I tried a post at /. but it wasn't accepted.  We have power
    in our [tiny] voices when used enmasse.

    -d

    Graham Murray wrote:

    > David Ford <david@kalifornia.com> writes:
    >
    > > There are a -lot- of large sites that give us issues like this.
    >
    > What is the best way to handle sites which block connections using
    > ECN? Is it best for everyone who detects this to write individually to
    > each site which they find can be accessed with "echo 0 >
    > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn" but not (in the default state) of tcp_ecn
    > = 1? Or is there some better way to spread the word more "officially"?
    >
    > So far I have written to every site which I have been unable to
    > access with ECN enabled, but the only response (apart from
    > auto-responders acknowledging the receipt of the email) I have had has
    > said that the matter has been forwarded to the site's IT department.
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    --
    "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
    eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
    'committed'."


    begin:vcard
    n:Ford;David
    x-mozilla-html:TRUE
    org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg">
    adr:;;;;;;
    version:2.1
    email;internet:david@kalifornia.com
    title:Blue Labs Developer
    x-mozilla-cpt:;28256
    fn:David Ford
    end:vcard
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:4.688 / U:0.264 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site