[lkml]   [2000]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: (reiserfs) Re: More on 2.2.18pre2aa2
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
    > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Chris Evans wrote:
    > >like the task scheduler policies we have. For example, maybe we could flag
    > >a given process so that all it's I/O requests go to the head of the queue.
    > Yes. We can't do that at the moment because at the elevator
    > layer we don't know who is waiting for I/O completion.

    As an approximation, you could take the task that queues the
    request. Only kswapd, kflushd and kupdate would be the "false
    alarms" here ... and we don't care all that much about them
    since they're only writing anyway.


    "What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
    -- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.020 / U:0.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site