Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 09 Aug 2000 13:07:02 -0700 | From | David Ford <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4 Status |
| |
Well....'long time' for me was ~ two months. Since CR's last patches, all has been well. I use shm for apache, gimp, postgres, etc dozens of times a day, day in and day out.
-d
Christoph Rohland wrote:
> Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au> writes: > > > At 03:55 09/08/00, David Ford wrote: > > > > * SHM segments not always being detached and destroyed right ? > > > > > >Haven't seen this happen in a long time and I use shm a lot. > > > > what's your definition of "a long time". > > > > some development work that i've been doing against 2.4.0-test3-pre4 > > shows that shm segments are most definitely lost and/or return to free > > verrrry slowly. > > > > (i'll be upgrading to test6-pre7 soon and if its still broken will advise) > > Since the shm code was not changed for a long time (long time is since > Jun 2) please advise now! > > I did not have _any_ complaints since my last patch to shm. > > Greetings > Christoph > > --
-- "The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was 'committed'."
begin:vcard n:Ford;David x-mozilla-html:TRUE org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg"> adr:;;;;;; version:2.1 email;internet:david@kalifornia.com title:Blue Labs Developer x-mozilla-cpt:;-12480 fn:David Ford end:vcard
| |