lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 2.4 Status
Well....'long time' for me was ~ two months.  Since CR's last patches, all has
been well. I use shm for apache, gimp, postgres, etc dozens of times a day,
day in and day out.

-d

Christoph Rohland wrote:

> Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au> writes:
>
> > At 03:55 09/08/00, David Ford wrote:
> > > > * SHM segments not always being detached and destroyed right ?
> > >
> > >Haven't seen this happen in a long time and I use shm a lot.
> >
> > what's your definition of "a long time".
> >
> > some development work that i've been doing against 2.4.0-test3-pre4
> > shows that shm segments are most definitely lost and/or return to free
> > verrrry slowly.
> >
> > (i'll be upgrading to test6-pre7 soon and if its still broken will advise)
>
> Since the shm code was not changed for a long time (long time is since
> Jun 2) please advise now!
>
> I did not have _any_ complaints since my last patch to shm.
>
> Greetings
> Christoph
>
> --

--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."


begin:vcard
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg">
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:david@kalifornia.com
title:Blue Labs Developer
x-mozilla-cpt:;-12480
fn:David Ford
end:vcard
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.051 / U:1.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site