Messages in this thread | | | From | "Linda Walsh" <> | Subject | RE: (reiserfs) Re: NFSv4 ACLs (was: ...ACL's and reiser...) | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:54:26 -0700 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Xuan Baldauf [mailto:xuan--reiserfs@baldauf.org] > If I understood Linda correctly, there is magic, because (the access to) the resulting > "." is resolved at chdir time, not at access time. Therefore access should succeed even > when chdir()ing, not chrooting(). And also according to Linda, open() could succeed, > because (the access to) the new "/" is resolved at chroot time (and not access time), > too. So who's right? (I agree that there is a misunderstanding, but I still cannot see > who is wrong with what opinion. :-)) --- Minor clarification. I didn't use the word "should" anywhere in my post. I simply described the current behavior of 2.2.16.
Deciding if the behavior should be changed is not a discussion of 'correct' vs. 'incorrect' behavior. It's a discussion of current behavior and proposed different behaviors.
-l
-- Linda A Walsh | Trust Technology, Core Linux, SGI law@sgi.com | Voice: (650) 933-5338
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |