Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 30 Aug 2000 20:19:04 -0600 (MDT) | | From | Chris Ricker <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz |
| |
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
> Before Rusty tells me that not everybody uses modules, > /lib/modules/<version> can exist even if the kernel has no modules, it > just needs a simple Makefile change. Think of /lib/modules/<version> > as a standard place to store information about kernel <version>.
I like the idea of a standardized repository in /lib matching the kernel. But if it's going to do more than modules, why not rename it something more appropriate, like /lib/kernel/<version> or /lib/linux/<version> or even (less preferably) /lib/<version>?
later, chris
-- Chris Ricker kaboom@gatech.edu chris.ricker@genetics.utah.edu
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |