[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [benchmark] 2.4.0-test6-pre1 PAE vs non-PAE

    the 3% performance drop is mainly due to two values, 'Pipe-based Context
    Switching', 'Process Creation', and 'Execl Throughput'. The fork() and
    exec() result is understandably worse with PAE, because the 'density' of
    page-tables is half of that of non-PAE page-tables (ie. twice as much has
    to be copied), plus there are 3 user-space root page tables instead of the
    1. (which have to be zeroed, so this shows up big time.)

    Another performance problem is likely the amount of LOCK-ed instructions
    done within the PAE include-files - some of that is unnecessery as David
    S. Miller noticed.

    otherwise the PAE kernels show no performance drop in 'typical' user-space
    stuff. But yes, you dont want to use it on a box with less than 4GB RAM.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.022 / U:12.572 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site