lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: waitqueues vs. wake_up_process

    On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    > Actually (test7) it's always good idea to use "wake_up_process()"
    > instead of a waitqueue, if in the waitqueue there would be only 1 task
    > at once.

    no, it's not a good idea for the reason i described: 1) extensibility of
    the code itself (you can easily change a waitqueue-based code to
    multiple-threads, you cannot do it with the wake_up_process() variant) 2)
    wake_up_process() is a scheduler-internal function and optimizations that
    go into waitqueues will not necesserily show up in wake_up_process(). As
    of 2.4.0-test7 you are right, but it's IMHO shortsighted.

    Ingo

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.020 / U:302.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site