[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: SCO: "thread creation is about a thousand times faster than on
    > > No no. You don't need to do that. That's exactly what CLONE_PARENT is
    > > there for. See previous example.
    > So would you accept CLONE_PARENT and CLONE_WAITPID patches for 2.4 ?

    Make sure CLONE_PARENT now remembers to check that the parent is part of the
    same thread group - the original I believe didnt. So long as that is done
    right and your thread group changes on an exec (obviously) then I think
    CLONE_PARENT is safe

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.030 / U:37.976 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site