![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
BTW, this is a little off-topic, I kind of wonder what the right semantics for deadlock detection are with threads. POSIX 1003.1 1996-07-12 says: "A potential for deadlock occurs if a process controlling a locked region is put to sleep by attempting to lock the locked region of another process. If the system detects that sleeping until a locked region is unlocked would cause a deadlock, the fcntl() function shall fail with an [EDEADLK] error." Okay, that's a little vague already. Now let's make it more interesting by adding threads: Process Thread Action (executed in this order) A 1 grab lock X B 1 grab lock Y A 2 try to get lock Y B 2 try to get lock X Solaris 2.5.1 thinks this is a deadlock. Linux 2.4.0-test1-ac16 thinks it isn't. I haven't found any definition of what "putting a process to sleep" means in POSIX.1. Opinions ? - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH werner.almesberger@ica.epfl.ch / /_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||