[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] export wake_up_process on 2.2.17
    Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > well, if you do your own locking then yes. With waitqueues you need no
    > extra locking as far as thread exits go, and they are more generic.
    > wake_up_process() is used only a few very specific and kernel-internal
    > cases.

    We followed the bdflush() example. Should we still use wake_up_process,
    or waitqueues for a bdflush-type kernel thread? What will future
    versions of bdflush use (or will bdflush simply be replaced with
    something better)?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:38    [W:0.040 / U:4.136 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site