[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectUSB initialisation

On one of the ARM platforms, we have encountered a problem with the
order of initialisation of USB vs the initial "bus"-type hardware

Since Linus doesn't like new init calls going into init/main.c, the
initialisation of a chip which has PCMCIA and USB hardware incorporated
is placed at the head of the initcall list.

However, the USB drivers (OHCI) are initialised before this time by
an explicit call in init/main.c.

Can we initialise the USB hardware drivers via the initcall method,
or is there some reason why its done the way it is?

Linus, if its not acceptable to change the USB drivers in this way,
would you object to this type of init call going into init/main.c?
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King --- ---
| | | | / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.049 / U:40.072 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site