lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromDavid Woodhouse <>
SubjectRe: [patch?] Re: Do ramdisk exec's map direct to buffer cache?
DateFri, 11 Aug 2000 10:13:34 +0100
tolkien@mizi.com said:
>  I don't understand that 'JFFS ought to be able to do XIP'. There are
> some code for it? 

Not yet, but it's not very difficult to do it.


tolkien@mizi.com said:
>  we need to prove that the compressed fs is better than XIP in point
> of performace and less use of memory. Though we'll not use XIP, we
> must implemet it. 

That makes a lot of sense, I suppose. Although it might be quicker, if
you're only after a {dis,}proof-of-concept, to knock up a read-only
filesystem which does XIP. 

--
dwmw2



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2008