[lkml]   [2000]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Complaint about recent LINUX_VERSION_CODEs
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Michael Rothwell wrote:
> > Perhaps the real problem isn't the "feature freeze" but the numbering --
> > maybe we should still be in the "" pre-nothing stage currently. Or
> > the FAQ needs to be updated.
> Indeed, now that LINUX_VERSION_CODE has the value 0x20400 for all
> kernels over the last few months, it's impossible to write modules that
> will compile on all of them :-(

Is that really a big deal? Its a test series which will have a stable
interface once 2.4.0 proper is released.

My own pet peeve is ppl avoiding the KERNEL_VERSION() macro when doing
LINUX_VERSION_CODE tests. Makes each test a bit more readable.


Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | Andre the Giant has a posse.
MandrakeSoft, Inc. |

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [W:0.093 / U:3.436 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site