Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Definitions | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Date | 10 Aug 2000 16:43:26 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Reiser <hans@reiser.to> writes:
Hans> Alan Cox wrote: >> > If a feature freeze is no reason not to add a new > filesystem, >> why is Reiser told no, but JFFS is just added w/o > debate? Other >> than the obvious webpad connections. >> >> MTD was added intentionally and had been discussed/cycled through a >> few times [I'd rejected earlier versions of it]. JFFS got added by >> accident
Hans> This is hilarious.
Hans> The problem Redhat faces that inspires their opposition is that Hans> they know that if reiserfs goes in, the US market will go the Hans> way the European market has, and most of them will never go back Hans> even if ext3 is later performance effective. Why RedHat doesn't Hans> just help ReiserFS rather than fight it, well, this is the Hans> puzzle to me.
This is even more hilarious, you think the European market really adopted it?
Hans could you cut the crap and come back when you have some constructive to say on the list? It's been quite a while since you posted anything that was even slightly relevant to the list.
Jes
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |