lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: a joint letter on low latency and Linux
    Hello!

    > I admit that I'm very much a newbie here, but it seems that the effort to
    > make a faster printk() would be better off in other areas, since, in the
    > best of all worlds, it wouldn't ever be used during normal operation
    > anyway?

    The problem is not to make a faster printk(), but to make all the other
    output faster (and preemptive) and still having _safe_ printk -- if we use
    printk for reporting of errors, it should work reliably.

    Have a nice fortnight
    --
    Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@ucw.cz> <mj@suse.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
    "...take my advice, I don't use it anyway."

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.018 / U:62.280 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site