[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

> I admit that I'm very much a newbie here, but it seems that the effort to
> make a faster printk() would be better off in other areas, since, in the
> best of all worlds, it wouldn't ever be used during normal operation
> anyway?

The problem is not to make a faster printk(), but to make all the other
output faster (and preemptive) and still having _safe_ printk -- if we use
printk for reporting of errors, it should work reliably.

Have a nice fortnight
Martin `MJ' Mares <> <>
"...take my advice, I don't use it anyway."

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.047 / U:2.312 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site