[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: a joint letter on low latency and Linux

    > I admit that I'm very much a newbie here, but it seems that the effort to
    > make a faster printk() would be better off in other areas, since, in the
    > best of all worlds, it wouldn't ever be used during normal operation
    > anyway?

    The problem is not to make a faster printk(), but to make all the other
    output faster (and preemptive) and still having _safe_ printk -- if we use
    printk for reporting of errors, it should work reliably.

    Have a nice fortnight
    Martin `MJ' Mares <> <>
    "...take my advice, I don't use it anyway."

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.021 / U:8.600 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site