lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: a joint letter on low latency and Linux
    Date
    From
    Artur Skawina <skawina@geocities.com> said:

    [...]

    > No, "smart" linking of the kernel at boot time is enough to eliminate
    > the useless code. For example, here is what you can do:
    > instead of generating the spinlock code (it's an asm() anyway) you just
    > mark the place where it would have been used (eg by placing the address
    > in some .init section). Then the boottime "linker" (loader) can figure
    > out whether the code is necessary (based on hw detection and/or user
    > input) and add it. [...]

    I understand going through all this pain (and extra tools for compiling a
    kernel, and stability problems, etc) for binary-only OSes. We have a better
    choice...
    --
    Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
    Casilla 9G, Vin~a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.025 / U:29.424 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site