Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:14:06 -0400 (EDT) | From | Peter Jones <> | Subject | Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs |
| |
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Khimenko Victor wrote:
> > FHS also says that a distro should ship with nothing in the /usr/local > > tree. > > And I find it ridiculous. Yes, for FILES I agree - it's place to install > local files for system. But for directory stubs... Where the hell I must > put local perl packages ? I prefer /usr/local/lib/perl for architecture > specific-ones and /usr/local/share/perl . And I (as dstribuion creator) > even can configure perl to use this directories. But I CAN NOT (according > to FHS) create this directories. Gosh. So now I need to GUEES where I can
You've missed the point of /usr/local . FHS says that a vendor can't put things in /usr/local; not that a sysadmin can't. If a vendor is shipping perl, /usr/lib/perl5 and /usr/bin/perl is _just fine_. By definition, that _isn't_ local.
-- Peter
Al Gore saying he invented the internet is like me saying I invented the exponential -- Gordon Moore
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |