lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs
    On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Khimenko Victor wrote:

    > > FHS also says that a distro should ship with nothing in the /usr/local
    > > tree.
    >
    > And I find it ridiculous. Yes, for FILES I agree - it's place to install
    > local files for system. But for directory stubs... Where the hell I must
    > put local perl packages ? I prefer /usr/local/lib/perl for architecture
    > specific-ones and /usr/local/share/perl . And I (as dstribuion creator)
    > even can configure perl to use this directories. But I CAN NOT (according
    > to FHS) create this directories. Gosh. So now I need to GUEES where I can

    You've missed the point of /usr/local . FHS says that a vendor can't put
    things in /usr/local; not that a sysadmin can't. If a vendor is shipping
    perl, /usr/lib/perl5 and /usr/bin/perl is _just fine_. By definition,
    that _isn't_ local.

    --
    Peter

    Al Gore saying he invented the internet is like me saying I invented
    the exponential
    -- Gordon Moore


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:4.114 / U:0.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site