lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: recent names_cachep change


On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Fair enough. vfs_init() sounds reasonable. Probable place for it, though...
> How about fs/filesystems.c?

Just put it in fs/dcache.c, then dcache_init() can be static. And move
filescache_init() there too from kernel/fork.c (and files_cachep should
probably be declared somewhere in a header file). The kernel/fork.c
location happens to be where it is allocated/de-allocated, but
conceptually it's a VFS data structure. Oh, and file_table_init() and
dquot_init_hash should be there too..

The vma_init/buffer_init/page_cache_init/kiobuf_setup/ipc_init stuff
should probably be done as a "mm_init()" or something.

And fork_init/signals_init is probably kernel/fork.c, as "process_init()".
So that init/main.c looks a bit cleaner.

(init/main.c already looks a lot better than it _used_ to look. But if
people are changing it anyway, I'd rather change it a bit more to clean it
up further, than to just let it start expanding again..)

Linus


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.035 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site