[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Direct access to hardware
James Sutherland <> writes:

> On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> > Which is exactly the point. The hard drives should be checking for
> > invalid ATA commands in hardware, right in the drive, preventing
> > damage from bad commands. Putting a filter into the kernel is not
> > the right fix.
> As with some of the Intel CPU bugs, the problem is NOT "invalid ATA
> commands" - it's a matter of VALID commands which are dangerous. FDIV on
> early Pentiums isn't an invalid instruction - it just produces the wrong
> results at times. So the SOFTWARE must do something to avoid this - either
> that, or you need to replace the hardware, which isn't desirable. You do
> something in the OS to prevent these problem commands being used.

So what does the kernel (can) do to prevent this problem on defective
Krzysztof Halasa
Network Administrator

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean