Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Direct access to hardware | Date | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:55:49 -0400 | From | Paul Barton-Davis <> |
| |
>> let me get this straight. are you saying that the "jaz" utility which >> lets me password-protect write access to my jaz disks should not exist >> under Linux ? this utility requires the ability to send that are >> vendor-and-device-specific SCSI commands to the drive. > >That doesn't sound like a good implementation, but I doubt these commands >would be in the same category of command as the flash update ones. I'm >interested in the dangerous category, not the merely undocumented bits.
so, what do you think would be a good implementation and how do you propose to distinguish this "category" of command from one to update the drive ROM ?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |