lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: NFSCTL_LOCKD (0x10000) unimplemented? (2.4.0-test5-pre4)
From
>>>>> " " == Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com> writes:

> ok, what about statd? can I leave it out of userspace startup
> too (/usr/sbin/rpc.statd) or not?

Unfortunately not. The nature of lock monitoring means that rpc.statd
needs to write stuff (the address of either the server on which locks
are held or the clients which are holding locks) to permanent
storage. It would be a very bad candidate for a kernel-space
implementation.

Cheers,
Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.042 / U:0.772 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site