lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: TO HELL WITH IT THEN......(re: disk-destroyer.c)
    On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:

    > On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 01:50:42AM -0700, bodnar42@bodnar42.dhs.org wrote:
    >
    > > Alright, actually, after having a cup of coffee (most of which ended up
    > > on my keyboard :( ), I fully agree with our poor misunderstood friend
    > > Andre. If something is providing access to something at a protocol level,
    > > it is its job to make sure that the protocol is not violated.... imagine a
    > > TCP/IP stack that let you send invalid packets, that wouldn't go over too
    > > well.
    >
    > Of course you can send invalid TCP/IP packets using the network stack in
    > Linux. You can send any packets.
    >
    Not a packet that will turn your Ethernet card in to a paperweight... this
    is a much more serious issue than an invalid TCP/IP packet.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.019 / U:0.456 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site