[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Subjectversion numbering
    I was wondering if there was any reason that version numbers get really weird near release time...  Couldn't there be a standard numbering scheme for these?  I don't see why there was kernel 2.3.x, kernel 2.4.0-prey, kernel 2.4.0-testx,
    kernel 2.4.0-testx/prey..... Is it really necessary to have special version numbers? If so, why not just stick to the 2.4-pred? Or perhaps even
    2.3.326pre or something.... Is there a reason that 2.4 pre-releases are not stored under version 2.3 on

    David Feuer
    This message has been brought to you by the letter alpha and the number pi.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.017 / U:30.952 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site