lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [patch] drivers/mtd/Config.in
Date

tigran@veritas.com said:
> not only that, but also what Linus said recently, i.e. "a printk when
> nothing is wrong is a bug" (or something like that). If you look at fs/
> jffs/inode-v23.c:jffs_read_super() it has a couple of imho unnecessary
> printk()

Removing the 'successfully mounted' printk is reasonable - although it's
only on mount and it's within CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL code so I'd hardly class
it as essential. The other two definitely look like 'something wrong' cases
to me, though. I'll chat with you later.

There is actually a more serious bug fixed in the JFFS code which has
already made it into my tree - but I'm waiting for Al Viro to give me his
verdict and any necessary patches before I offload that onto Linus.


--
dwmw2



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:1.664 / U:0.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site