[lkml]   [2000]   [Jul]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Gigabit NIC question.
>>>>> ">" == Christopher E Brown <> writes:

>> On 12 Jul 2000, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Depends on what you do with it, at CERN we had soo many problems
>> with it on SMP machines. 2.2.x was an order of magnitude better.

> I think alot of it comes down to hardware choice. There
> seemed to be many more driver vs SMP issues with 2.0.3x, and some
> SMP support that 2.2.x did better when dealing with interesting SMP
> setups (some compaqs, ALR/Unisys/DataGeneral PProx4 and PProx6
> units/etc).

>> Pick known clean running MBs, and cards and you did well,
>> catalog engineer the system without researching what was stable
>> with SMP and get bitten hard.

Which is exactly what we did and it turned into a nightmare, the same
machines runs much better with 2.2.x. Intel motherboards, brand label
PCI cards etc etc. There is no generic rule for 2.0.x being more
stable than 2.2.x.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.053 / U:1.184 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site