Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Gigabit NIC question. | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Date | 11 Jul 2000 21:01:16 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca> writes:
Richard> Indeed. A procmail recipe even avoids you having to see the Richard> crap in the first place. I can see why some people use the Richard> base64 abortion, though: if they inline a patch it gets Richard> filled with "=3D" gunk, because they're using some or other Richard> character set encoding :-(
Happens just as often from people with iso8859-1 setups due to broken / misconfigured mail clients.
>> Kim, if you want Gigabit Ethernet I'd strongly recommend you >> consider porting whatever it is you have that requires 2.0.x onto >> 2.2.x or later.
Richard> It might not be a 2.0.36 driver that is needed. It may be the Richard> 2.0.36 reliability!
2.0.36 reliawhat?? If you are looking for GigE performance you are likely to want SMP and SMP in 2.0.36 is absolutely not realiable.
Jes
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |