[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: PNP design philosophy?
    Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003091601390.1186-100000@asdf.capslock.lan>
    By author: "Mike A. Harris" <>
    In newsgroup:
    > It is specific. I read it as a 386 system. i486 is a 486
    > system.
    > And how would saying ix86 making it more specific?
    > Actually, "x86" or "ia32" are the appropriate terms. If you are
    > refering to the Intel 32 bit linux port (or original depending on
    > your viewpoint and level of pragmatism), it is _mislabeled_
    > "i386" for legacy reasons. Calling your machine an
    > "i386" because of the name linux gives it architecturally is a
    > good way to be misunderstood. Use "x86" or "ia32" to refer to
    > Intel architecture as opposed to sparc/alpha, etc..

    No, it really isn't. The i386 is a *very* different architecture than
    the 8086, i186, or i286. The name IA-32 is a very recent construct.

    <> at work, <> in private!
    "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.020 / U:21.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site