[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PNP design philosophy?
Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003091601390.1186-100000@asdf.capslock.lan>
By author: "Mike A. Harris" <>
In newsgroup:
> It is specific. I read it as a 386 system. i486 is a 486
> system.
> And how would saying ix86 making it more specific?
> Actually, "x86" or "ia32" are the appropriate terms. If you are
> refering to the Intel 32 bit linux port (or original depending on
> your viewpoint and level of pragmatism), it is _mislabeled_
> "i386" for legacy reasons. Calling your machine an
> "i386" because of the name linux gives it architecturally is a
> good way to be misunderstood. Use "x86" or "ia32" to refer to
> Intel architecture as opposed to sparc/alpha, etc..

No, it really isn't. The i386 is a *very* different architecture than
the 8086, i186, or i286. The name IA-32 is a very recent construct.

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.043 / U:4.592 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site