lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: BSD Licensed files in Linux kernel.
On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 12:01:28PM +0300, Khimenko Victor wrote:
> In <383326804.952471407031.JavaMail.root@web34.pub01> Lee Chin (leechin@mail.com) wrote:
>
> khim != lawyer
>
> > Does this mean to say that If I link my application with glibc, I have to
> > gove away my code under either GPL or a more liberal licence?
>
> Yes, if you link it STATICALLY. If you link dinamically LGPL (but NOT "plain"
> GPL!) has special exception clause and thus in such case you can use any
> license you wish...

Linking is linking. Statically or dynamically makes no difference
legally, it's only a technical issue.

It is however required that it is possible to link the binary to a
locally modified version of the used library. With shared libraries
this is relatively simple, with static linking the binary distribution
has to contain separate object files for the library and the
application (additionally to the linked executable) so that it can be
relinked to a different library version.

IANAL, but you can look it up in section 6 of the LGPL for yourself.

--
Andreas E. Bombe <andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de>
http://home.pages.de/~andreas.bombe/ DSA key 0x04880A44

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site