Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Mar 2000 06:50:10 -0500 (EST) | From | Alexander Viro <> | Subject | Re: bug: mount on an open directory succeeds |
| |
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000 almesber@lrc.di.epfl.ch wrote:
> yields different st1 and st2 (2), and quite clearly a violation of > POSIX if > > stat("bar",&st1); > stat("./bar",&st2); > > yields different st1 and st2 in any case (2). "." is _meant_ to be > a no-op. > > (1) "questionable", because POSIX explicitly excludes the mount > operation, so by using mount(), this example is outside the > scope of the standard.
The whole situation is outside (both cases) because you can't get the object in question without mount()...
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |