Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 5 Mar 2000 22:35:34 -0700 (MST) | From | "Ronald G. Minnich" <> | Subject | Re: Help in DSM design |
| |
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Obviously DSM works for some situations and horribly breaks > in others. What about sticking non-intrusive DSM code in the > kernel and attach a BIG FAT WARNING to it?
Shoot, you don't even need it in the kernel. That will make a bunch of folks even happier.
Here's a warning.
"WARNING. This is DSM support code. 1) If you don't like it, for religious or other reasons, don't use it. 2) If you like it, but it doesn't work well for your particular application, don't use it. 3) If you like it, and it works well for your application, use it but don't tell anyone on linux-kernel because a bunch of them will yell at you and tell you it doesn't work."
> There are no magic bullets, so shooting down DSM because it > isn't a magic bullet seems a bit strange to me...
well, strange, but hardly unusual for this type of forum :-)
We need a new bumper sticker: "I'm sorry, my dogma ran over your karma"
ron
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |