[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Virtual vs. physical swap & shared memory forks (clone)
    Rik van Riel writes:
    > On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Linda Walsh wrote:
    > > The idea is *predictability*. Guarantees of behavior.
    > > Your user deamon is fine for many cases, but it's execution is
    > > not deterministic.
    > Please back up your assertions with code. If you can implement
    > a non-overcommit option which doesn't put overhead in the normal
    > kernel, I'm sure people will use it.

    It would probably be helpful to the audience at large to explain just
    how overheads could increase with non-overcommit.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.019 / U:42.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site