[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Endless overcommit memory thread.
Followup to:  <>
By author: Linda Walsh <>
In newsgroup:
> I think there should be a 2nd system call with semantics like
> 'vfork' or IRIX's sproc that explicitly allows data segment sharing
> so only stack space needs to be allocated for the fork to work.
> Current fork -- I lean toward not overcommitting -- it seems more
> proper.

You mean like vfork()? Or clone()?

<> at work, <> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.119 / U:3.980 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site