Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:10:47 -0300 (BRST) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: Overcommitable memory?? |
| |
On 23 Mar 2000, david parsons wrote:
> The computational overhead for non-overcommit is less than the > overhead for overcommit + some all-singing all-dancing oom killer > that has to make decisions about which process to kill.
I'm amazed you say this without having looked at the code first.
Rik -- The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network of people. That is its real strength.
Wanna talk about the kernel? irc.openprojects.net / #kernelnewbies http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |