Messages in this thread | | | Date | 21 Mar 2000 14:42:31 +0100 | From | "Rask Ingemann Lambertsen" <> | Subject | Re: Overcomittable memory |
| |
Den 19-Mar-00 19:47:15 skrev James Sutherland følgende om "Re: Overcomittable memory":
> Or just commit based on the memory which is really being used by the > process, which is nice and simple, and hasn't caused any problems I > know of yet.
And is exactly what you don't mean by the word commit.
> It works - why change it?
Because it _doesn't_ work. It breaks programs which follow the rules.
Regards,
/¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯T¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯\ | Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: mailto:rask@kampsax.dtu.dk | | Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ | | mailing list. I am on the list.| "ThrustMe" on XPilot, ARCnet and IRC | | Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it still exists. |
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |