[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Overcommitable memory??
Den 20-Mar-00 18:44:28 skrev Horst von Brand følgende om "Re: Overcommitable memory?? ":
> Jesse Pollard <> said:

> [...]

>> YOU ARN'T OOM - a specific user is out of resources, not a catastrophic
>> failure.

> If the user's programs get killed, they'll be pissed off.

And for a good reason too. So don't kill the user's programs. That's why
Jesse and others would really like per user memory quotas, just as you have
per user disk space quotas. If you can disable overcommit, the program is
in control of what happens when it can't get the amount of memory it would
like. If you also add per user memory quotas, the system administrator can
prevent a single user (or another finite number of users) from using all


| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | E-mail: |
| Please do NOT Cc: to me or the | WWW: |
| mailing list. I am on the list.| "ThrustMe" on XPilot, ARCnet and IRC |
| Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard drive? |

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.110 / U:14.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site