[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Logical problem withj devfs/devfsd
> Richard decided that's how devfs will work (r-x on symlinks).  Normally
> symlinks are always rwx, but Richard made the decision "to break
> programs that oughtn't depend on this" as far as I can tell.

His symlinks are broken yes

> > Therefore the pcm and mixer devices are not accessible for writing.

Note I changed these to be owner only. You cannot default stuff like pcm
to general access its not secure. It is the job of PAM to assign devices
to console users.

> Are you sure? As I understand symlinks, the permissions of the symlink
> don't matter.

In theory

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [W:0.036 / U:6.908 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site