Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:45:46 -0500 (EST) | From | Adam <> | Subject | updated 'patch-kernel |
| |
comments?
I think there's no point to add support to automatic patching of the extraversion kernels as the naming is so inconsistent.
another thing is the jump from 51 to 99 n the sublevel from the 2.3.51 to 2.3.99-pre1
----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- patch-kernel-backup Wed Mar 15 00:15:11 2000 +++ patch-kernel Wed Mar 15 00:38:43 2000 @@ -27,14 +27,22 @@ stopvers=${3-imnotaversion} # set current VERSION, PATCHLEVEL, SUBLEVEL -eval `sed -n 's/^\([A-Z]*\) = \([0-9]*\)$/\1=\2/p' $sourcedir/Makefile` +eval `head -4 $sourcedir/Makefile | sed -e 's/ //g'` if [ -z "$VERSION" -o -z "$PATCHLEVEL" -o -z "$SUBLEVEL" ] then echo "unable to determine current kernel version" >&2 exit 1 fi -echo "Current kernel version is $VERSION.$PATCHLEVEL.$SUBLEVEL" +echo -n "Current kernel version is $VERSION.$PATCHLEVEL.$SUBLEVEL" +if [ -n "$EXTRAVERSION" ]; +then + echo "$EXTRAVERSION" + echo "unable to cope with 'extraversion' kernels" >&2 + exit 1 +else + echo "" +fi while : do -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |