lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 15 Mar 2000 21:08:51 +0100
SubjectRe: changes in df
FromAndreas Schwab <>
Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> writes:

|> On 2000-03-13T14:12:28,
|> nbecker@fred.net said:
|>
|> > I wonder if some utils will be confused by the strange new entries.
|> > Is this really a good idea?
|>
|> df must be fixed. Has been discussed before. See man statfs.

Hmmmm, SUS2 does not define any special meaning for -1 in struct statfs.
Moreover, fsblkcnt_t and fsfilcnt_t are required to be unsigned integers,
thus -1 does not really fit here.
What's wrong with using zero as before??

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
Andreas.Schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2010