Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 15 Mar 2000 21:08:51 +0100 | | Subject | Re: changes in df | | From | Andreas Schwab <> |
| |
Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de> writes:
|> On 2000-03-13T14:12:28, |> nbecker@fred.net said: |> |> > I wonder if some utils will be confused by the strange new entries. |> > Is this really a good idea? |> |> df must be fixed. Has been discussed before. See man statfs.
Hmmmm, SUS2 does not define any special meaning for -1 in struct statfs. Moreover, fsblkcnt_t and fsfilcnt_t are required to be unsigned integers, thus -1 does not really fit here. What's wrong with using zero as before??
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." Andreas.Schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |