lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 10 Mar 2000 10:09:25 +0100
FromPavel Machek <>
SubjectRe: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix
Hi!

> > ...and btw it is nice to see if some activity happened on some
> > "unused" irq line: (If you are changing this, making it output unused
> > but active interrupts might be nice, too...)
>
> > 4: 5 XT-PIC
> > 5: 4 XT-PIC pcnet_cs
> > 6: 3 XT-PIC
>
> it's already possible to see unused IRQ stats in /proc/stat, and

It is well hidden in /proc/stat... (I did not know about that, ok.)

> /proc/interrupts is pretty long on bigger IO-APIC systems if all IRQ
> sources are listed. I'm not sure wether we want this.

It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are doing something
strange. And it should not be much bigger than it is now -- there
should not be much "active but currently not used" interrupts.
Pavel
--
I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents me at discuss@linmodems.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2010