Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:09:25 +0100 | | From | Pavel Machek <> | | Subject | Re: PATCH: /proc/irq/ fix |
| |
Hi!
> > ...and btw it is nice to see if some activity happened on some > > "unused" irq line: (If you are changing this, making it output unused > > but active interrupts might be nice, too...) > > > 4: 5 XT-PIC > > 5: 4 XT-PIC pcnet_cs > > 6: 3 XT-PIC > > it's already possible to see unused IRQ stats in /proc/stat, and
It is well hidden in /proc/stat... (I did not know about that, ok.)
> /proc/interrupts is pretty long on bigger IO-APIC systems if all IRQ > sources are listed. I'm not sure wether we want this.
It might alert people that non-listed interrupts are doing something strange. And it should not be much bigger than it is now -- there should not be much "active but currently not used" interrupts. Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents me at discuss@linmodems.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |