[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: elevator-starvation-4 (2.2.14 && 2.3.42) [was Re: 2.3.42 elevator latency] (fwd)
    On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

    >I started killing the next pointer in my early research until I noticed I
    >was breaking lowlevel drivers (ide scsi at least) and so I started

    Since I have to break the ->next and queue_head things I'll just drop also
    the head_active thing. If there's some subtle reason for wanting to keep
    it let me know (but I am fairly certain there aren't except for the
    breaking driver thing that I am doing anyway ;).


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.023 / U:6.448 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site