[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: elevator-starvation-4 (2.2.14 && 2.3.42) [was Re: 2.3.42 elevator latency] (fwd)
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

>I started killing the next pointer in my early research until I noticed I
>was breaking lowlevel drivers (ide scsi at least) and so I started

Since I have to break the ->next and queue_head things I'll just drop also
the head_active thing. If there's some subtle reason for wanting to keep
it let me know (but I am fairly certain there aren't except for the
breaking driver thing that I am doing anyway ;).


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.050 / U:36.220 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site