lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Memory Started not at 0x00000000
    Thank you for your suggestions.  I did change SuperH implementation so
    that it uses init_bootmem_node and free_area_init_core. Well, it
    works.

    But I'm not sure if it's good use or not. At least, it seems that
    free_area_init_core is not intended to be used, since it is not
    defined in header file.

    Things are going like this:

    setu_arch
    call
    init_bootmem_node

    paging_init
    get info. from:
    NODE_DATA(0)->bdata->node_boot_start
    NODE_DATA(0)->bdata->node_low_pfn
    then call
    free_area_init_core (Should I use free_area_init_node instead?)

    mem_init
    get info. from:
    NODE_DATA(0)->bdata->node_boot_start
    NODE_DATA(0)->bdata->node_low_pfn

    I think that it would be better if we define macros for START_PFN and
    MAX_LOW_PFN, then we could eliminate the variable max_low_pfn even
    in the i386 implementation.
    --

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.038 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site