[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: oom killing
    On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, ADAM Sulmicki wrote:

    > I was hoping it would never make to kernel, and if it did, it
    > would never be enable by default. But it seems I was wrong on both
    > accounts :(

    > VM: killing process sendmail
    > VM: killing process klogd

    This is *NOT* the OOM killer I submitted to Alan. My killer
    spits out different messages and tries to locate the memory
    hog first so it avoids killing sendmail and klogd.

    > and while I'm sending this email I can attach this debug info on
    > elevator as well. Perhaps someone will find it usefull.
    > __elevator_merge: req latency 3989 req latency 3977
    > __elevator_merge: req latency 3878 req latency 3870

    I believe Andrea (or someone else?) has pinned down and
    fixed this error. Anyway, this is just some debugging
    code you're hitting ... it should be completely harmless.

    Development kernels are exciting, aren't they :))


    The Internet is not a network of computers. It is a network
    of people. That is its real strength.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.018 / U:24.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site