[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [proposal] /dev/debug to host kcore (and others in the future)
    H. Peter Anvin writes:
    > Followup to: <200002222116.IAA03334@mobilix.atnf.CSIRO.AU>
    > By author: Richard Gooch <>
    > In newsgroup:
    > >
    > > Tigran Aivazian writes:
    > > > Hi Richard,
    > > >
    > > > I thought of moving /proc/kcore to devfs and there is no obvious
    > > > place to put it. Why not create a /dev/debug/ and put kcore (and
    > > > profile) in there? In the future one can have ktrace (or whatever
    > > > it was called from IKD patches, can't remember).
    > >
    > > How is /proc/kcore different from /dev/kmem or one of those devices,
    > > anyway? (I haven't bothered to look)
    > >
    > > I'm considering moving the "memory" devices to /dev/mem anyway.
    > > /proc/kcore, if it is actally different, would belong there, IMO.
    > The memory devices would be inadvisable to move, since they are
    > "well known" device locations. ALL Unices have them.

    Yes, I know. That's why the patch I sent to Linus didn't do that ;-)
    But perhaps /dev/kmem, /dev/mem, /dev/port, /dev/random and
    /dev/urandom could be moved, since only Linux-specific tools would
    need to be modified.

    It's really only /dev/full, /dev/null and /dev/zero that are "well

    > We used to have /dev/core, for some reason it was moved to
    > /proc/kcore for no apparent reason, except that perhaps gdb wanted
    > the size information.

    In that case we could move it. First add it to devfs and eventually
    remove it from /proc.



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.019 / U:7.840 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site