lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IP changes in 2.3.4x make things wierd?
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 01:24:30PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:

> IP_RECVERR is one option.

I thought I understood what the change that has been made was; that
various UDP socket operations can no longer return ECONNREFUSED when
they receive an ICMP port unreachable.

Testing this does seem to confirm this -- but setting IP_RECVERR
doesn't seem to restore the previous behavior? Am I missing
something?

2.2.14: Old (desirable behavior for some a particular application I
have)

socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
sendto(3, "I had a little dog. His name was"..., 39, 0, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = 39
select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {2, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {2, 0})
recv(3, 0xbffffae8, 512, 0) = -1 ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)

2.3.47: New (undesirable behavior)

socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_NO_CHECK, [1], 4) = 0
sendto(3, "I had a little dog. His name was"..., 39, 0, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(80), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}, 16) = 39
select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {2, 0}) = 0 (Timeout)

Oh, and I don't know if this is a bug or not, but 2.3.47 has the
`old' behavior still when you use connect() & write() as opposed to
sendto().



-cw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.103 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site