lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Capabilities
Hi!

> > > Now, with all of that being said, if you don't want the full
> > > POSIX model, it's probably easier to simply leave things the way they
> > > are right now, and not try to put anything in the filesystem. Just
> >
> > I'd like to see elfcap in kernel ;-). That gives verifiable way to
> > know that process drops its capabilities.
>
> Not workable. We would also nead coffcap, javacap, scriptcap, etc. We really
> need to store the capabilities in the filesystem(s).

Well, maybe it is better than requiring ext2cap, reiserfscap, vfatcap,
isocap, udfcap and nfscap :-).
Pavel
--
The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.291 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site