lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Capabilities
    Hi!

    > > > Now, with all of that being said, if you don't want the full
    > > > POSIX model, it's probably easier to simply leave things the way they
    > > > are right now, and not try to put anything in the filesystem. Just
    > >
    > > I'd like to see elfcap in kernel ;-). That gives verifiable way to
    > > know that process drops its capabilities.
    >
    > Not workable. We would also nead coffcap, javacap, scriptcap, etc. We really
    > need to store the capabilities in the filesystem(s).

    Well, maybe it is better than requiring ext2cap, reiserfscap, vfatcap,
    isocap, udfcap and nfscap :-).
    Pavel
    --
    The best software in life is free (not shareware)! Pavel
    GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.018 / U:30.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site