lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Question about stat()
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:

> > We could do with a much more precise time_t structure for the future,
> > methinks.

> How about 64-bit nanoseconds? This fixes the year-2038 problem too.
> (this is for the VFS and new filesystems)

How about calling the new struct 'time_t64', it could be a long long
containing nanoseconds.

Thus existing code won't break.

Cheers,
Alex
--
Signatures suck.

http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.039 / U:31.552 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site