[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch-2.3.46-p2] P6 microcode update support
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I agree that it's probably better to use /proc/drivers/<drivername>, and I
> shouldn't have said /proc/sys/xxx. Although in this case I like "sys"
> better than "driver" as a name (it's just the sysctl _tables_ I hate, not
> the _name_ /proc/sys)

aha, I hate sysctl tables too, now. So, you meant
/proc/driver/<drivername> like it is done, e.g. by rtc. I see, so all
you want is just a simple /proc/driver/microcode file which supports a
single ioctl and not an entry in kernel/sysctl.c to be fiddled by
sysctl(2) system call. I misunderstood you.

Ok, I will come back with implementation when it is ready.


PS. It was a good idea to read email before coding - I almost started
fiddling with ctl_table stuff :)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.074 / U:1.736 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site