lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2000]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Does anybody try to compile the 2.3 kernels at all ? :((
Date
From
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch> said:
> >>>>> "Sergey" == Sergey Kubushin <ksi@ksi-linux.com> writes:
> Sergey> On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> >> > that it'd probably compile with kgcc-2.7.2.3 (although breaking
> >> in some > other part), but it's to illustrate that NO vanilla
> >> 2.2.xx kernel is > compileable outta the box...

> >> I don't care if it doesnt build with gcc 2.95. I keep telling
> >> people this. It seems to work with 2.95 now except for a few odd
> >> driver bits.

> Sergey> Please, do return to the ground. kgcc-2.7.2.3 is dead long
> Sergey> ago. As well as libc-4.something...

> gcc-2.7.2.3 is *the* recommended compiler for 2.2.x!

Maybe. But I bet most are compiled either by an egcs release (Red Hat does
this) or 2.95.2 nowadays. Several by other variants, like pgcc (Mandrake).
--
Horst von Brand vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl
Casilla 9G, Viña del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:56    [W:0.500 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site